Balancer Hack Results in Over $100M Loss, Dealing a Devastating Blow to the DeFi Industry
Original Article Title: "Veteran DeFi Compromised: Balancer V2 Contract Vulnerability, Over $110 Million in Assets Stolen"
Original Article Author: Wenser, Odaily Planet Daily
Editor's Note: Today, the DeFi protocol Balancer fell victim to a hack, with the stolen funds now exceeding $116 million. Several projects have taken remedial actions: Lido has withdrawn its unaffected Balancer position, while Berachain has announced a network halt to conduct an emergency hard fork to address the Balancer V2-related vulnerability on the BEX.
Furthermore, Hasu, the Strategic Director of Flashbots and a Strategic Advisor to Lido, expressed in a post that "Balancer v2 went live in 2021 and has since become one of the most closely watched and frequently forked smart contracts. This is very concerning. Every time a contract that has been live for so long gets hacked, it sets DeFi adoption back by 6 to 12 months." The following is the original content:
On November 3, the veteran DeFi protocol Balancer was reported to have over $70 million in assets stolen. Subsequently, this news was confirmed by multiple parties, and the size of the stolen funds continued to grow. At the time of writing, the amount of assets stolen from Balancer had increased to over $116 million. Odaily Planet Daily will briefly analyze this incident in this article.
Balancer Hack Details: Loss Exceeds $116 Million, Mainly Due to v2 Pool Smart Contract Flaw
According to on-chain information, the Balancer attacker has now stolen over $116 million in assets, with the main stolen assets including WETH, wstETH, osETH, frxETH, rsETH, rETH, spread across multiple chains such as ETH, Base, Sonic, etc., where:
· Assets stolen on the Ethereum chain: approximately $100 million;
· Assets stolen on the Arbitrum chain: nearly $8 million;
· Assets stolen on the Base chain: nearly $3.95 million;
· Assets stolen on the Sonic chain: over $3.4 million;
· Assets stolen on the Optimism chain: nearly $1.57 million;
· Polygon On-Chain Asset Theft: Approximately $230,000.

Crypto KOL Adi posted that initial investigations indicate that the attack primarily targeted Balancer's V2 vault and liquidity pool, exploiting a vulnerability in smart contract interactions. On-chain investigators pointed out that a maliciously deployed contract manipulated the Vault call during pool initialization. Improper authorization and callback handling allowed the attacker to bypass protective measures, enabling unauthorized swaps between interconnected liquidity pools or balance manipulation, resulting in a rapid asset theft within minutes.
Based on the available information, there is no evidence of private key exposure; this is purely a smart contract vulnerability.
Audit firm kebabsec auditor and citrea developer @okkothejawa also mentioned, "The check error mentioned by @moo9000 may not be the root cause, as in all 'manageUserBalance' calls ops.sender == msg.sender. The security vulnerability may have occurred in a transaction prior to the creation of the contract that extracts assets, as it led to some state changes in the Balancer vault."
Balancer's official response stated: "Our team is aware of a potential vulnerability affecting Balancer v2 pools. Our engineering and security teams are actively conducting a high-priority investigation. Once we have more information, we will immediately share verified updates and next steps."
Berachain, which faces potential asset loss risks, also promptly responded. Following a post by the Berachain Foundation, Berachain founder Smokey The Bera stated, "The Bera node group has proactively paused the public chain operation to prevent the Balancer vulnerability from affecting the BEX (mainly the USDe three-pool).
· Instruct Ethena team to disable Bera bridging
· Disable/Suspend USDe deposits in the lending market
· Suspend HONEY token minting and exchange
· Communicate with CEXs and ensure hacker addresses are blacklisted
Our goal is to recover the funds as quickly as possible and ensure the safety of all LPs. The Berachain team will immediately release binaries to relevant node validators and service providers once ready (as this pool contains non-native assets, it involves some slot reconfiguration, not just modifying the Bera token balance)."
Balancer Attacker On-chain Information: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/cd756cb8-6a84-4f40-9361-f6c548544430
Balancer Hack: Cryptocurrency Whale Most Nervous
As a well-established DeFi protocol, Balancer's users are undoubtedly the most directly affected by this hack. For current users, actions that can be taken include:
· Withdraw funds from Balancer v2 pools to prevent further losses;
· Revoke Authorization: Use Revoke, DeBank, or Etherscan to revoke smart contract permissions from the Balancer address to avoid potential security risks;
· Stay Vigilant: Keep a close eye on the Balancer attacker's next moves and whether they will have a cascading impact on other DeFi protocols.
Additionally, a dormant cryptocurrency whale that has been inactive for 3 years has drawn attention in this hack.
According to LookonChain monitoring, a 3-year dormant crypto whale with the address 0x009023dA14A3C9f448B75f33cEb9291c21373bD8 has suddenly awakened after the Balancer platform vulnerability occurred. The whale is eager to withdraw its $6.5 million related assets from Balancer. On-chain information: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x009023dA14A3C9f448B75f33cEb9291c21373bD8
Latest Development: Hacker Initiates Token Exchange Pattern
According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin's monitoring, the hacker of the Balancer hack has begun attempting to exchange many liquidity-staked tokens (LST) for ETH. Previously, the hacker exchanged 10 osETH for 10.55 ETH.
On-chain data shows that the hacker is continuously exchanging stolen assets across multiple chains for ETH, USDC, and other assets using the Cow Protocol. Currently, the hope of recovering these stolen assets seems slim.

In the future, whether Balancer can promptly identify the protocol contract vulnerability and recover the stolen assets quickly, or provide a corresponding solution, Odaily will continue to follow up.
You may also like

In the name of charity, for the benefit of the family: How the Trump family turned charity into profit?

Will Gold Break $4,500 After Tonight's Fed Decision? What XAUT and PAXG Traders Need to Know

Cursor, why did you get on Musk's spaceship?

Morning Report | DeepSeek completes over $7 billion in financing, with a valuation exceeding $50 billion; Musk's personal wealth has surpassed the total market value of Bitcoin

SharpLink CEO: How to understand that Ethereum developers have just surpassed 1 million?

Morning Report | MiCA grace period expires on July 1; Kalshi's trading volume in the first week of the World Cup breaks $5.1 billion, setting a record

The foundation of SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation: Who is dividing Musk's annual capital expenditure of tens of billions?

How to exit after asset tokenization?

The stablecoin positioning battle escalates: When compliance is just a ticket to entry, will USD1 become the biggest winner?

A16Z: The sun bears witness, SpaceX is worth 7.5 trillion

Mergers and acquisitions in the cryptocurrency market are exceptionally active

Concerns Behind the Binance Customer Service Controversy

SpaceX Stock Prediction After the IPO: Can SPCX Reach $200 Before QQQ Inclusion?

Congratulations to Carl Moon on His Historic Ferrari Challenge Le Mans Podium Triumph
Crypto influencer and racing enthusiast Carl Moon finished third in the Ferrari Challenge Le Mans Coppa Shell class, marking his best result of the year. As his racing partner and sponsor, WEEX celebrates this remarkable achievement and continues to lead crypto’s journey beyond boundaries, uniting the innovation of digital assets with the passion of motorsport.

Can the CLARITY Act Become Law by July 4? Everything You Need to Know About the Final Battle

France vs Senegal World Cup 2026: Mbappe’s New Era Begins Against a Historic Rival

What is the connection between Huang Zheng of Pinduoduo and blockchain?

